Updated most of Greenland, law specifies UTC–2 with no DST in 2023Īdded names of British Crown dependencies and Mayotte adjusted Rockall and names of Brazilian islandsĬorrected parts of Greenland, Canada, US, Rio de Janeiro, islands of Cedros, Jan Mayen, Imbros, Tromelin, Macquarie, Kure adjusted Caribbean added or adjusted names of various places to match their Wikipedia articles merged bottom text considering negative numbers Wisconsin’s Assembly districts rank among the most gerrymandered nationally, with Republicans routinely winning far more seats than would be expected based on their average share of the vote, according to an Associated Press analysis.( newest | oldest) View ( newer 10 | older 10) ( 10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)Īdjusted Australia, Ukraine, Spain, Cape Town, Syria, Jordan, Karachi, Omsk, Ürümqi, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky Republicans adopted maps last year that were similar to the existing ones. The legislative electoral maps drawn by the Republican-controlled Legislature in 2011 cemented the party’s majorities, which now stand at 64-35 in the Assembly and a 22-11 supermajority in the Senate. Those seeking new maps contend that the Supreme Court violated the separation of powers doctrine when it adopted the Republican-drawn map that Evers had previously vetoed, “improperly seizing powers for itself the Constitution assigns to other branches.” Even if the court decided to address the issue, it could only affect alleged areas where districts aren’t contiguous and not upend existing district lines, Republicans argued. Wisconsin’s redistricting laws, backed up by state and federal court rulings over the past 50 years, have permitted districts under certain circumstances to be noncontiguous, attorneys for the Legislature argued. That makes Wisconsin an outlier nationally, with 46 other states having no noncontiguous districts, and Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and Tennessee having a total of nine noncontiguous districts, attorneys argued. The majority of current legislative districts - 54 out of 99 in the Assembly and 21 out of 33 in the Senate - violate the state constitution’s contiguity requirement, attorneys challenging the maps argued Monday. Wisconsin’s redistricting case centers on whether the current districts are not contiguous and if they violate the Wisconsin Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine. The Legislature argued that the court should give it time to draw new maps and not rush to enact something any sooner than the 2026 election. The regular four-year cycle would resume again in 2026. In Senate districts that are midway through a four-year term in 2024, there would be a special election, with the winners serving two years. The redistricting lawsuit, filed the day after Protasiewicz joined the court in August and flipped majority control to 4-3 for liberals, asks that all 132 state lawmakers be up for election next year in newly drawn districts. Protasiewicz, in her decision not to recuse from the case, said that while stating her opinion about the maps, she never made a promise or pledge about how she would rule on the case. If Protasiewicz overturns the court’s earlier ruling adopting the Republican-drawn map, that will be evidence of unconstitutional “prejudgment and bias,” the Legislature argued. Those comments “invited” the filing of the current lawsuit, the Legislature argued in its latest filing with the Supreme Court. ![]() ![]() Republicans have argued Protasiewicz has pre-judged the case based on comments she made during the campaign calling the current maps “unfair” and “rigged.” Vos last week suggested he would pursue impeachment if Protasiewicz votes to throw out the Republican maps. Impeachment has drawn bipartisan opposition and two former conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court justices, asked by Vos to investigate the possibility, told him it was not warranted. Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos continues to threaten impeachment of Protasiewicz after she refused to step down from the redistricting case. New maps favoring Democrats would weaken Republicans’ grip on legislative power, which they have also used in the Senate to fire Evers appointees and to threaten impeachment of Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz and the state’s elections leader. ![]() Republicans are also just two seats short of a supermajority that would allow them to overturn Evers’ vetoes. They have all but eliminated collective bargaining for public workers, and since 2019 they’ve been a block on Evers’ agenda. During that time, they have enacted a wide range of conservative priorities. Republicans have been in majority control of both the Wisconsin Senate and Assembly since 2011.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |